You Bitch!
6th of December, 2025

Everybody Needs a Hobby...

Posted by Rube | 15 January, 2007

The hobby, the age-old balance between what you do for bread and what you do for fun. Everybody needs a hobby, whether that means astronomy, collecting bottle caps, or watching the boob-tube. Watching TV gets short shrift, if you ask me. It's nothing worse than reading comic books or blogs, really. But it's somehow gotten the attention of do-gooders everywhere, sort of like smoking and drinking. Smoking has been linked to everything from insomnia to low sperm count. Second-hand smoke is supposedly deadlier than the first-hand variety, despite the hard work smokers do filtering out the bad stuff with their own lungs and tracheas. Likewise, it's a widely know factoid nowadays anyway, that you burn more calories sleeping than you do while watching television. Once studies come out about you claiming absurd notions that no one dares to question, you know you've done something right.

250Px-T-1000

But I'm not here to champion smoking or watching television per se; I doubt the two most popular pastimes of the 20th century need or expect my help. I'm here to tell you about my new hobby: Watching old episodes of the X-Files. Now, I always thought I knew a thing or two about special agents Mulder and Scully, and really felt no need to do any catching up. That is, until I actually sat down and watched an episode last year, only to realize that Mulder had been replaced by a T-1000 and nobody had noticed the switch! Granted, replacing Mulder with a single-minded, humorless robot that displays no emotion as it goes about its work isn't exactly what you'd call a catastrophic disruption, but you'd think the people around him would at least notice that it's a totally different dude! I decided to investigate.

As it turned out, not only was I missing the plot arc that involved a Terminator taking over Mulder's office, I'd also missed the part about the series being cancelled in 2003. So, I decided to turn to our old friend Mr. Torrent and do some catching up after all. Since I made that fateful decision about 6 months ago, the little lady and I have been watching an episode or two every evening, give or take. We've steeped ourselves in this fascinating bit of Clinton-era thêatre paranoie to the point where I realize that, despite having seen an episode or two back in the day, I know exactly fuck-all about the X-Files.

In retrospect, this isn't surprising, considering I never watch television. I mean, I try to slip into the comfortable rhythms, the somnambulant dynamic of the Tube, the Almighty, the One I so worshipped as a child. But I can't get my head around the fact that you can watch television for days, literally, and never once see a bukakke tentacle rape take place. I guess the Internet has spoiled me in that way. Nevertheless, there is good television to be found, as long as you have a good tracker. With years and tens of gigabytes of content before us, and a cheap DivX player as our trusty guide, we embarked on our journey to figure out just what the Hell Chris Carter and his minions were trying to tell us with their 10+ years of air time.

From the first scene, I knew that I had missed out on a whole bunch of things the first time 'round. In the pilot, for example, you see Scully in her underwear, as she examines a curious bug-bite in the bathroom mirror. Very erotic, albeit in a ham-handed, back-of-the-Sears-catalog kind of way. Up to that point, I had been under the impression that Gillian Anderson had been a bit pudgy for the first few years of the X-Files, and that it had actually damaged her character in later seasons when she had become the mercilessly hot red-headed seductress we all know and love today. But I was mistaken: She was built like a brick shitter from the very beginning.

Gillian Anderson5The pilot also painted a rather remarkable version of Fox Mulder, one that I wasn't familiar with. He wore tacky sweaters, cracked terrible jokes constantly, and tried to be an all-around goof. These things went away, of course, as Mulder's demeanour became famously glazed and torpid. I guess the meds kicked in after the first couple of episodes. But one thing from the pilot stayed in the series, and I never noticed it. Namely, Special Agent Fox Mulder is a porn freak. A quick exchange in Mulder's office has Agent Scully referring ironically to his 'special video tapes', which he apparently has locked away in a drawer under the iconic "I Want to Believe" poster behind his desk. Apparently, he "Wants to Believe" that a woman could actually do that with a Heineken bottle.

In subsequent episodes, many references are made to Mulder's obsession with porn and masturbation. For example, in an episode about a grunge teenager who can channel lightning (which co-stars Jack Black and the medic from Saving Private Ryan), Mulder and Scully find a sleazy magazine called Big 'Uns, or something similar, and Scully makes a reference to Mulder having a subscription. Mulder timidly cops to it. In another episode, where Peter Boyle plays a psychic who can foresee how people die, a most disturbing exchange takes place while Scully is driving and Boyle is riding shotgun. Boyle says, "there are a lot of dignified ways to die, but autoerotic asphyxiation isn't one of the them." Mulder pokes his head in from the back seat and asks, suspiciously, "why are you telling me this?" At one point in the series you actually see Fox masturbating. At the end of Jose Chung's From Outer Space, he's laying in bed watching a well-known videotape of a supposed Bigfoot sighting, operating the VCR remote with his left hand while his right hand remains hidden under the covers. Any male over 30 would recognize the de facto official position of self-gratification of the those times. It was the early-90's version of using the mouse with your left hand.Skinner 9 01

But the X-Files wasn't only about waxing the dolphin. There are some great insights into the American mindset of the mid-90s. Every strenuous meeting that takes place in the office of Assistant Director Skinner (also a jerk-off addict, by the way) was smiled upon by the soothing, beatific visage of Attorney General Janet Reno on the one side and Bill Clinton on the other. Ah, the glory days of right-wing paranoia. Man, those were good times: The Unabomber Manifesto, the cattle mutilations, the crop circles, the black helicopters that hovered over Waco and Ruby Ridge. They just don't make psychotic delusions like that any more.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 62.68
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.7
SMOG:11.0
Coleman Liau:12.99

Stupid Wrong-Headed Locale Crapola

Posted by Rube | 13 January, 2007

Being a native English-speaker in a foreign land can be a real pain in the ass. Especially if you're using a computer. First of all, you'll probably be buying keyboards and the like from local purveyors, instead of having them flown in specially like the rich boys do. Getting used to a new keyboard is a task unto itself: the German keyboard, for example, reverses the positions of the Y and Z keys in relation to U.S. English keyboards, in addition to relocating the most of the special punctuation symbols ({,},|,) to finger-breaking combos involving the magical, mystical "Alt-Gr" key. Most commonly used symbols in command-line environments, like the / (Shift-7 in German layout), were not really envisioned as Barre chords, and using them a lot can be exasperating.

Figure 1: The German PC Keyboard (Stolen from Here)

Even worse are the efforts by all the world's programmers to be the cleverest little boys in town when it comes to solving the localization problem. Take Google, for example. Even though they have more money and resources than about 80% of sovereign nations, they've chosen the least reliable method possible to determine a user's preffered language: His geographical location. If your IP address is in Germany, you'll get forwarded to the German start page. It's a solution, I guess, but it paints users with a very broad brush. If you're a businessman travelling in Germany, for example, and you type in "google.com", that's not what you'll get; you'll get google.de. Oh, you can set a cookie with Google to always be in English, but you'll have to navigate to the "Settings" page, if you happen to know that Einstellungen means 'settings', then pick your language from a drop-down list you probably can't read, then save your new settings. As long as you know what Einstellungen Speichern means.

But a lot of people in Germany don't speak German; and even more don't have it as their first language. There are a lot of English, Turkish, and Italian speakers, not to mention Russian, Vietnamese, and Chinese left over from the Communist East German days; among them are people who can't even read Latin characters. Using geography to determine language doesn't even wash in the United States even more, since the Burrito Invasion went into overdrive. So why not just let the user tell you what language he wants if you're so interested. In reality, he already is telling you, you're just not listening! Here's another example. If you install a program under Windows, more often than not that program will use the Locale setting to determine which language to display. If you live in Germany, it will display – you guessed it – German, no matter what language your Windows OS is running in. When I install SVN, for example, and type "svn help" at the command prompt, this is what it returns:

C:\Documents and Settings\eric>svn help Aufruf: svn UNTERBEFEHL [Optionen] [Parameter] Subversion Befehlszeilenclient, Version 1.3.1. Geben Sie 'svn help UNTERBEFEHL' ein, um Hilfe zu einem Unterbefehl zu erhalten.

Now, considering my Windows installation is in English, why in the world would this POS be spitting German at me?Because it uses the Locale setting instead of the Language setting, and this is wrong. Although I'm speaking English, I'm still bound by other Locale settings, like the Euro Symbol and date format, when I'm living in Germany. I'm not sure why everybody in the world gets this wrong, but they do.

Here's how it should be: Your web page – I'm looking at you, Googlezonhoo! – shouldn't show me a language I don't understand just because your GeoIP database says that's what language I should speak. My browser tells you what language I want with the "Accept-Language" header. This is a much more reliable indicator than my IP address as to whether or not I can speak English or not. Most Germans use German versions of their web browser, which will in turn send you that information. That's what it's there for! Thanks, Dr. Schmidt, you can make the billion-dollar check payable to "Rube".

As to your application, Mr. SVN, why the hell don't you read the Language setting instead of the Locale setting? If you ask at install time which language you should use, why would you do it in German? What if I was in Japan and couldn't make heads nor tails of the posed question? I guess it doesn't help that Microsoft itself confuses the role of a Locale with that of a language. Even better is their insistence that an "Input Language" is the same thing as a keyboard layout! Bravo, Bill! How does having a German keyboard magically change the language that I'm typing on it to German? Bob knows. Observe what happens with the following Python code:

C:\Documents and Settings\eric>python ActivePython 2.4.2 Build 10 (ActiveState Corp.) based on Python 2.4.2 (#67, Jan 17 2006, 15:36:03) [MSC v.1310 32 bit (Intel)] on win32 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import win32api >>> print hex(win32api.GetUserDefaultLangID()) 0x407 >>> print hex(win32api.GetSystemDefaultLangID()) 0x409

Huh? Looking at Microsoft's handy localization page, I see that 0x407 is German, and 0x409 is U.S. English. I'm getting a different language for my user than I am for my system, even though we're both in Germany, and we're both speaking English. In other words, even though I'm using the English version of Windows, my user language is set to German because I've got a German keyboard? What a crock o' crap. Windows' Multilanguage Support is viciously, unfixably broken.

A lot of programmers give very little thought to internationalizing their products. Some people, like the ones mentioned here, would've been better off ignoring it and sticking to English-only versions.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 47.49
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 10.4
SMOG:11.6
Coleman Liau:14.32

Sympathy for the Zune

Posted by Rube | 9 January, 2007

Zune-Frown-1 Hey, man, you ain't bad. Think about what kind of splash you'd've made back in, say, 2003! You would have been fucking king back then. And that screen, man, that's even better than a 5th generation iPod! Don't go breaking your head about that 6th generation iPod, iPhone, whatever, because you came out first, my man. You beat that poser to market by a good six weeks, so you've got that going for you.

And who needs a phone anyway, dude? Phones are so, you know, 20th century web 1.0 and shit. You've got the Social, my friend. At least, you will, as soon as all that Wi-Fi stuff gets worked out, what with Universal demanding their cut and all. I dig. But still, you think that iPhone-come-lately even thought about clearing all that 802.11b/g/n and Bluetooth stuff with the RIAA before flouting it all over town? Now really, man, would a true friend do that? That ain't what people want. What's to stop somebody from just sendin' all that copyrighted stuff over email to their buddies without the record labels getting a cent?! Who does that Apple think they is, anyway? They don't even put those "Intel Inside", "Made for Windows 2006", "Graphics by XYZ", or "Centrino" stickers on their junk! What's up with that?! How's a brother to know what chipset he's using, know what I'm saying?

Don't you worry, Zune, my man. We know who our friends are.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 62.95
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 6.6
SMOG:7.9
Coleman Liau:16.26

Apple iPhone: Calamity for the Mac?

Posted by Rube | 9 January, 2007

Iphone-Intro

Despite my near-absolute conviction that it would never happen, Chairman Jobs dropped the i-Bomb today on a suspecting crowd. By all accounts, the patented jobsian Reality Distortion Field went all the way to eleven at MacWorld Expo this morning as the Steve introduced the new Apple iPhone. The iPhone is, without a doubt, the sexiest-sounding piece of hardware ever, period. As its proponents were hoping, it brings to a mobile phone typical Apple touches, like motion-sensing gestures and easy media management, and does so in a way that will have Apple fans and detractors alike buzzin about it for weeks to come. It looks like a big, big win for Apple, and a disruptive entry into the smart-phone market.

"But hey, little Rube, why the long face?" you might ask, should you see the frown I'm wearing at this moment. And it may seem strange, me being a Mac Fanboi and it being Apple's day in the sun, that I would be in any kind of mood other than near-ecstasy. So, I'll explain. Although I'm a big fan of the Mac, there's nothing here that bodes well for that platform. The iPhone will almost certainly be a cross-platform device, which means a lot more Windows users are going to be using it than Mac users. And since I'm not really in the market for a portable phone, it's nothing more to me than yet another cool iPod that I can't afford. The iPhone comes at the expense of the Mac platform, not for its greater glory. In fact, it stole from the Macintosh platform its annual holy day, the MacWorld keynote.

Probably the biggest news for Mac users, which will remain almost completely overlooked, is that a commercially-available version of Mac OS X now exists for portable devices. Windows CE has been, up to now, the only really normal OS for handheld computers (not including the current iPod OS, which is most certainly the best-selling). But today, Apple showed they have a portable, flash-based version of OS X running on a hardware platform that includes wireless networking, bluetooth, and a brilliant touch-screen display to show it on. This makes the iPhone the best handheld PC on the market.

This bodes well for the iPod, of course. I don't see Apple abandoning. the sub-$500 market completely, and now that they have the hardware and software platform for it, could 802.11-enabled, bluetooth-capable iPods finally become a reality?

What I would like to see happen now is a hard-disk based iPod successor, somewhere in the 30-60GB range, with the form-factor and OS X version of the iPhone, but without the mobile phone part of it. It would be the second coming of the Newton, at a time when nobody gives a second thought to plopping down 350 bucks for an Apple product that fits in their pocket.

Jobs' demo today showed why Apple have made a lot of the decisions we've seen over the past year or so. First, they dropped the PortalPlayer iPod platform at the height of its popularity. Then, they made headlines all over the Web by securing enormous amounts of flash-memory around Asia, and everyone postulated flash-based MacBooks by year's end. Then, it leaked out that Apple had patented resolution-independent user interface technology, presumably for large screens running OS X 10.5 Leopard. Who would've thought that they were actually thinking about high-density mobile displays running a tiny, tiny version of OS X?

While everyone was salivating over a phone today (a phone for gossake!), I was thinking just one thing: Cool! There's a version of OS X that runs on StrongARM (or whatever's in there), includes Safari and Cover Flow, and runs entirely from flash memory! I wonder what the boot-times are on one of those phones?

Winners: Yahoo Apple Google Cingular OS X

Losers: Zune Windows CE The Macintosh Me

Technorati Tags: , , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 62.98
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.6
SMOG:10.8
Coleman Liau:12.06
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease -27.68
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 18.6
SMOG:10.1
Coleman Liau:44.24

Ok, I'm Back

Posted by Rube | 5 January, 2007

I hope everyone had a happy and raucous holiday season. My December was surreal enough. I'm moving to England, it seems.

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 55.91
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 7.2
SMOG:9.7
Coleman Liau:6.85

Blogwars

Posted by Rube | 17 December, 2006

"You'd have to set up little 'blog policemen' on these entries to shoo away onlookers - 'Move along, nothing to see here!' But no, people stand there looking at the dead animal at the side of the road, at two people full of pride making complete fools of themselves in public, and then go and write whole blog entries about it." Stefan Niggemeier, media journalist and photoblog author, on a dispute in the blogosphere. The two "complete fools" Niggemeier means here are 'DonAlphonso', author of the A-list blog "Rebellmarkt", and Peter Turi, also a journalist, and author of the "Turi2" blog. The start of the argument goes a long way back, but the current escalation began when 'DonAlphonso' repeatedly referred to Peter Turi in his blog as a "blogging failure" - Turi struck back by calling Meyer a "moaning minnie". What started as a minor skirmish developed into a heated conflict, with both sides receiving support. Over the course of the dispute, old scores were settled, fervent slanging matches went on in several blogs, and threats of lawyers were made. Finally, Peter Turi shut down his blog - though it's unclear whether this was directly or only indirectly related to the argument.

The argument between Turi2 and Rebellmarkt is not a one-off. The introduction of the “social web?, and all the technologies that constitute it, has made it possible for social relationships to occur in part or entirely on the internet for the first time. Weblogs aren’t just a new form of website, they’re also a new form of cohabitation – “virtual living rooms? home to human relationships. Together with weblogs though, a new form of argument has also developed. Unlike the well-known phenomenon of “flame wars? - conflicts which take place in a forum or chat room – this new form of dispute is taken more seriously and carried out with much greater engagement. These new conflicts have a different dynamic, follow different rules, and have serious, irreparable consequences for those involved. These are blogwars. CausesIn his article “The extraordinary anger in weblogs?, ’Axonas’ names “communicative unbedding? as the main reason for blogwars:
“Direct social checks are largely absent in a digital network. Generally, you don’t meet people there who can have any influence on your own immediate personal sphere, so the majority of online 'buddies' are virtual friends in this sense. Forums and email lists try to compensate for the lack of social checks by enforcing netiquette, via the use of permission authorisations and moderation. If you look at current forums though, this doesn’t seem to have generated any learning effect, even after years of existence. In weblogs, even these rudimentary controls of communication are absent. In the world of weblogs, there’s no ‘Big Brother’ of internet access, equipped with powers similar to forum moderators. Using my weblog, I can access the diverse public sphere which constitutes the "blogosphere", and do whatever I like in terms of aggressive communication, which, apart from legal measures, knows no bounds.“
In a certain way Axonas is right - on the internet, an environment which can regulate people who violate social norms is often missing. Behaviour which would lead to a strong backlash in real life is easily possible on the internet without any problems – the phenomenon of “trolling“ is well-known. However, Axonas overlooks the fact that in contrast to the rest of the internet, there is no “communicative unbedding“ in weblogs. On the contrary: Weblogs are a communicative space in which social exchanges take place. If you blog, you’re not doing so in isolation, but surrounded by an environment of other bloggers and visitors. This social network functions in a similar way as in the real world - it defines a general moral code of what’s right and wrong, and enforces it. A blogger who doesn’t stick to the rules valid in his part of the network will meet with resistance - objections in their own weblog or those of others, loss of readers, and deletion from blogrolls. So how come there are still blogwars? Precisely because of this social network. In contrast to the early days of the internet, much more social activity takes place in the “social web“ than before, and where there’s social activity, there’s also competition, arguments and fights. Unlike in earlier days, bloggers really have something at stake in these disputes; a weblog almost always represents an important aspect of someone’s life, which they maintain with lots of effort and may rely on for a number of reasons. And since the stakes have risen with Web 2.0, they are fought for more strongly. Development Blogwars often develop at extreme speed. The blogosphere is a highly-networked environment in which information flows more quickly and uncontrollably than ever before. Thus, it is often impossible to predict how a conflict will develop: Some blogwars only last a few days and end with little in the way of consequences, while others drag out over months and leave the losers badly damaged. Despite this, an attempt will be made here to classify the different phases of development of blogwars: The initiation phase, the escalation phase, the main phase and the closing phase. Every blogwar starts with the initiation phase. As with every form of conflict, the starting point is a conflict of interests - in other words, two parties with different interests which contradict one another. In the case of a blogwar, this may be many things: Political disagreements, personal disagreements, rivalries or misunderstandings. It’s also not unusual for one blogger to attack another simply for the fun of the fight; in this case the blogwar is self-serving. There are also some bloggers who deliberately use blogwars to get attention, to keep their blog interesting and gain new readers. Whatever the original reason for a conflict, it’s almost always infinitessimally small, and in no relation to the effort made on its behalf. The disagreement escalates to a real blogwar in the escalation phase - the two adversaries attempt to outdo each other, and use up more and more resources and time doing so. At some point, when the relevant arguments have been exhausted but the dispute continues, the conflict crosses over into the personal sphere, and the warring parties begin to attack each other directly and on an individual level. The escalation phase is also the stage in which supporters, in double or even triple figures, normally enter the blogwar on both sides. Participants rarely join in due to the content of the disagreement; as in a real war, it’s mostly about loyalties, alliances and old scores. Alliances are often made according to the motto “the enemy of my enemy is my friend“. In the main phase, the conflict reaches its peak: Both sides attempt to do as much damage to the opposing side as possible, by trying to attack them at vulnerable points and harm their credibility. To this end, substantial numbers of blog entries and comments are made, listing old and new arguments, often combined with damaging information and threats. If the conflict is large enough, a majority of the blogosphere will assume a position and either declare solidarity with one of the two parties or neutrality. The disagreement is normally concentrated to one or two weblogs. These are often, though not necessarily, those of the original disagreeing parties – though what may also happen is that a blog with a wide readership starts to follow the blogwar, and thus the attention of the blogosphere is diverted there. Having a home advantage in a blogwar is something which shouldn't be overlooked: Not only does the blog generate attention and gain new readers due to the conflict, but the “host? is also in a better position in the conflict - he has the support of his own readership, who are well-disposed towards him, and he can affect the discussion at any time by making or deleting entries at will. After a while, the attention of the blogosphere will drop away, and the blogwar enters the closing phase. Whether or not there is a victor at the end depends mostly on the goals of the participants, and these vary. If the objective was to get attention and thus increase the number of readers of your blog, then all participating bloggers will normally have achieved this and can be seen as ?victors“. If the blogwar was really about something outside of the argument, though, such as personal differences, revenge or rivalry, then the blogwar itself is only a side skirmish. The Turi-Alphonso conflict was a case like this: The antagonism between the two parties stretches back to a time when neither of them had a weblog. It is therefore irrelevant whose arguments were superior, whose credibility was damaged and whose reputation was tarnished after the argument. No-one won, as there was nothing to win. The only effect is that both sides have lost time and credibility - and were mentioned in an article by Stefan Niggemeier. The protagonists Peter Turi versus DonAlphonso was a disagreement between two bloggers. This form of blogwar is far from the only variant, however – bloggers just as often seek targets who are active outside of the blogosphere or even outside of the internet. Different combinations of this may be: Blogger vs blogger Blogger vs companies or organisations Bloggers vs private individuals Blogwars develop differently depending on who is involved. When bloggers fight amongst themselves, they are on more or less equal terms. The disagreements often have the character of a ritual fight; the two adversaries make lots of threats, make contact only briefly, then each goes their own way. This is different when one of the participants does not have a blog. In these cases, a blogwar rapidly becomes a gauntlet; since the person under attack cannot defend themselves, they are helpless, and at the mercy of the attacking blog – something which is known in the German blogosphere as “die Sau durchs Dorf treiben? - literally, "parading the pig through the village?. The party under attack is unable to adequately defend their own position but comes under attack from all sides. The consequences in such cases can be devastating – especially if it is not an organisation or company under attack but a private individual, a human being with feelings. The victims Blogwars, just like real wars, rarely occur between equally matched opponents. It’s much more common for one or more blogs to “attack? a considerably weaker opponent. When this happens, it’s often a nasty shock for the party under attack. A victim can already suffer massive damage before even understanding what’s actually happening. Even when an off-guard victim discovers the attacks in good time, they often react incorrectly - defending themselves with inappropriate means, neglecting good argumentation or spelling and just making everything worse. At some point in the course of the blogwar, the victim will notice the consequences which threaten him. The first thing they’ll notice is what’s happening with Google. Searches for the name or online pseudonym of the victim will no longer just display harmless internet pages, but also the results of the blogwar - defamations, aspersions and attacks. The victim will be afraid, and justifiably so, that the allegations listed will be noticed by employers, colleagues or family members. The victim will also be confronted with a multitude of different insults or threats, often so many that it’s impossible to respond to them all. The most unpleasant comments here aren’t those made by the “leader of opinion“ - the blogger who started the blogwar – comments or blog entries made by the ?ground troops“ normally hit harder. These comments are often loaded with prejudice, and explicitly insulting. A victim will see the conflict “overflow? and be taken up by other blogs, which then add new aspects and information of their own. They will see how some bloggers, for whatever reason, trawl the internet for information, looking for “dirt? to use against them. In this way, information which seemed completely harmless before, such as publicly managed photos, a personal homepage or entries on dating sites, becomes ammunition for the attacking forces. The effects experienced by the victim depend on how robust they are and how much experience of conflict they have, as well as on how much is at stake. A steely A-list blogger is certain to deal with a blogwar differently than a labile teenager with little internet experience. If you let the conflict get too close to you, you will suffer from effects similar to those of bullying – panic, stress, sleep disruption and neglection of other tasks. In addition to mental problems, the victim can also sustain real-world damage. Especially for people looking for work, or those who rely on maintaining a good reputation in the “global village?, negative Google results can be problematic. For a programmer, online journalist or someone in the marketing sphere, a lost blogwar could mean the end of a career in certain cases. Strategies and tactics First, it is important to advise against engaging in blogwars at all. Apart from the fact that most conflicts are best solved by other means, it’s rare for anyone to really profit from a blogwar. Even in conflicts where one party is clearly at a loss to the other, the winning side will also have to accept losses; those involved in a blogwar inevitably lose credibility. They’ll gain new readers, but not the sort of readers a blogger wants – fight chasers and rubberneckers, a public only reading out of a desire for sensation and scandal. Not everyone, though, has the opportunity to decide for themselves whether or not they want to participate in a blogwar. Some are drawn in against their will. In cases like this, it's important to know the rules of battle and the methods used in fighting a blogwar. • The most important weapon in a blogwar is information. Information on the opponent, on yourself, and on any third parties involved. The information of most interest is that which extends beyond the online sphere - the real identity of the opposing parties, where they live, the names of their employers, etc. • However, it’s also just as important to know what information the other side has on you. At the start of a blogwar, it is therefore wise to not only research what’s worth knowing about your enemy, but also to investigate what information Google and Technorati contain about you. If you recognise “vulnerable points“ during the research, there's little sense in removing these. You can assume the enemy will have taken screenshots of them as proof - plus most webpages are archived in the Google cache. An exposed cover-up attempt can be worse that the information covered up itself. It’s better to leave the information there but prepare yourself with a good explanation. • If you take part in a blogwar, you need to be well-informed, and quickly informed, the whole time. Within the space of a few minutes, new developments can arise, new "fronts" can be opened or others reduced to shreds. There are different ways of keeping track of information like this, which are best made use of in parallel: Tracking programs such as Statcounter, blog search engines such as Technorati, and manual research. It’s important to regularly check the visitor movements and referrers on your own website; this is a quick way of seeing whether another blog has linked to it, whether someone has distributed links via email, and which search terms people are using to reach your blog from search machines. It also goes without saying that you should regularly visit blogs involved in the conflict and follow discussions in the comment threads. In some cases, you may have to react to new developments very quickly. Once the relevant information has been gathered, you need to decide how to proceed further. For many people, who have no experience with the blogosphere or who can expect a clear defeat for other reasons, the most advisable alternative is not to respond at all. After a while, the attacker will have used up all of their ammunition, lost interest and moved on to other things. Lots of things can then be dealt with more simply afterwards. If you nevertheless decide to actively take part in a blogwar, you should keep a few important rules in mind: • Nothing is more dangerous than poorly thought-out comments. It’s essential to double-check all facts you state and all arguments you make. Responses should be coherent, convincing and well-formulated. • If possible, don’t carry out the conflict on your enemy’s territory. Only leave comments in other blogs to link to your response - on your website, managed by you. • Anyone who becomes too personal loses credibility. Even when sorely tempted, always refrain from using expletives. Always remain calm and level-headed, use objective arguments, and draw attention to the lack of objectivity of other arguments. • Only play as fair as your enemy - but don't play less fair either. It can be useful to have “dirt“ on your opponent up your sleeve, but it’s not always wise to use it and is only rarely in your own interest. In many cases, especially those where you have no way of defending yourself, it’s advisable to contact a lawyer. German law has a number of options open here: You can file for injunctive relief or make a claim for damages, or make a complaint of defamation or libel. If you really want to continue the dispute by legal means, though, you need to be clear that this may become very expensive, and that victory is far from guaranteed. If you still decide to go ahead, make sure you hire a lawyer familiar with such disputes – this is more the exception than the rule. It is strongly recommended to hire a lawyer who specialises in intellectual property rights, or to specifically look for a professional with internet experience - for example, via the German Lawyers’ Union. After the blogwar Even though this is often forgotten in the heat of battle, every blogwar ends sometime. Once oil is no longer being poured on the fire, the interest of the blogosphere will wander over to a new topic, and the shadow will be lifted again as quickly as it was cast. Once the blogwar is over, it’s important to quickly return to normality, pick up the pieces, and carry on again in one way or another. A blogwar doesn’t always have entirely negative results, though - if the argument was witnessed by a majority of the blogosphere, participants will discover that the number of visitors to their blog will have increased by multiples. Some bloggers will treat this as a challenge to show that they can do more than just argue. In the end, even though the euphoria after a victory may be large, and the 5 minutes of fame may be addictive, blogwars aren’t really worth it. Blogs are tools, not weapons. They’re about creating something. Representing yourself. Sharing your knowledge. Being part of something. Making friends. Remember, blogging is supposed to be a Good Thing.

This article is a translation of a german text that was first released on my weblog "buchstaben in bewegung". It attracted some attention in the german blogosphere, so an aquaintance of mine, Niall McCourt, translated it. I´ve asked Rube if he could publish it here, so he gave me permission ;-). I´d like to bring this article to a greater audience, so if you feel you´d like to pick it up and republish it somewhere, go for it.

Niall is a freelance translator. If you think he could do a job for you, email him.

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 51.48
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 11.0
SMOG:12.6
Coleman Liau:11.2

Hard Weeks

Posted by Rube | 5 December, 2006

Howdy, friends and neighbors! Man, I've hard a tough couple of weeks. Ever since thanksgiving I've been busier than a butt-legged man in a nun-kicking contest. Deadlines to meet, servers to build and ship, the entire back catalog of X-Files to watch. We're all the way up to the one where that guy from Monk kills people with his dark-matter shadow.

Not that it's all been work-related, mind you. I've recently re-discovered video games. With the little woman away this past weekend, I eschewed eating, bathing, and sleeping to sail a cartoon boat around an imaginary world in Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker. Despite the obvious gayness inherent in all Zelda games, I'm secure enough in my masculinity to declare this THE BEST GAME EVER. I haven't been sucked into such a bottomless miasma of escapism and bad personal hygiene since the first Zelda, back in '88. That's right: miasma!

Anyhoo, that's about it. Almost. I also got a call from a rather large open-source company that you've probably heard of to come work for them in England. Maybe I'll move there with my sweetie, who knows. It'll be a big investment at first, since I'll have to buy a bowler hat and have my teeth darkened, but it'll probably be worth it, just for the weather.

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 74.49
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 6.3
SMOG:9.8
Coleman Liau:8.75

Thanksgiving

Posted by Rube | 27 November, 2006

I hope everyone had a good Thanksgiving. It's my favorite holiday, I think. It's truly a thing that everyone can do together, without worrying about offending anyone, unless it's because it's a typically American holiday. And let's face it: If that offends, then I'm happy to offend.

I cooked a turkey this year, for the first time ever. Being until recently a vegetarian, I was baffled by the various organs that I pulled out of the carcass, all neatly delivered in a little plastic bag. I realized that it was all probably edible, but I balked at eating the bagged innards, in the fear that one of them was the gizzard, which supposedly leaves a bad taste.

Treating Europeans to Thanksgiving is an enormous responsibility, but I think I pulled it off without disgracing my ancestors. By all accounts, my Southern Cornbread Dressing was not only edible, but delicious. I never realized that the defining taste of Thanksgiving Dressing is sage, of all things, and I was struggling Thursday afternoon with a tasteless mash of cornbread and gravy. But a few panicked phone calls to Mom can solve almost any crisis, and she finally, after all these years, spilled the recipe.

The in-laws were over, and I was able to feed and water them. There was French wine, German beer, and Southern American food. In short, there was much to be thankful for. And that's what I like about Thanksgiving: That reminder to sort out the things that make you happy, and be thankful for them. It's a good tradition; there's plenty of time to sweat the small stuff.

Hugs, Rube.

Technorati Tags:

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 64.61
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.0
SMOG:11.1
Coleman Liau:10.2

Sen. John Edwards does us all a favor

Posted by Rube | 17 November, 2006

Being a pompous douchebag, as the distinguished gentleman from North Carolina unmistakably is, does have its drawbacks. Can you imagine what kind of dishonest life you would have to lead if, like Edwards, you had to apologize nationally, in humiliating fashion, for trying to find your kids a Playstation 3 at Wal-Mart?

John Edwards _ a vocal critic of the retailer _ asked his local Wal- Mart store for help in getting the potential 2008 presidential candidate a Sony PlayStation 3. Edwards said a volunteer did so by mistake.

Edwards told The Associated Press that the volunteer "feels terrible" about seeking the game unit at Wal-Mart a day after his boss criticized the company, saying it doesn't treat its employees fairly.

Unbelievable stuff. Edwards is so beholden to unions and soy milk guzzling neohippies that he has to ask their pardon for doing exactly what 99% of parents in the United States are doing. This is what's known as 'being out of touch'. It betrays the intellectual dishonesty involved in being an empty-suit sound bite peddler.

Being an antisocial libertarian helps me immeasurably when it comes to lemming-like materialism. Were I not such a late adopter of technology, I would go into Wal-Mart myself and root around for Playstations 3; I would do this without a bad conscience, and would not have to apologize to anybody. Trust me, if Hitler's Electronics had them in ample supply, and at an acceptable price, I would walk in smiling with Visa in hand.

And now, as John Edwards contorts himself into various contrite postures, blaming his actions on subordinates, Playstations are most likely already in the homes of Wal-Mart executives across the country. Every Wal-Mart employee in North Carolina now has the opportunity to buy one before the good Senator. It's too bad they only make about $2 an hour, else they could bedeck the trailer with Christmas cheer, whilst a gloom hangs about the Edwards Manse.

Technorati Tags: , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 45.46
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 11.2
SMOG:12.6
Coleman Liau:14.56
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 104.64
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 0.9
SMOG:0.0
Coleman Liau:6.06

Kubuntu: Sucks

Posted by Rube | 14 November, 2006

For a lark, I downloaded the 4.5GB DVD for Kubuntu Linux. Ubuntu, upon which it's based, is the current darling of the Linux scene, so I figured I'd see how long it's come along since I last installed it.

Let's see...

  • No MP3 support, even for network streams like you'll find at Shoutcast
  • Major headache getting my ATI Radeon X1600 to work with 3D screen savers
  • Refresh rate capped at 75Hz
  • Printer sharing doesn't work
  • Zero progress on sound card configuration
  • Default resolution of 1600x1200 is a bit...ambitious. I can't find any way to change it permanently
  • Applications like Firefox, Thunderbird, KOffice, Scribus, et. al. not included
  • Did this thing really just ask me to insert my install DVD?! What is this, 1998?
  • System always locks up after KDE session logout
All in all, a shit sandwich, served pipin' hot. When will somebody in the Linux business finally decide to integrate their product? I realize that KDE can't really be expected to change the underlying configuration directly, as long as the stuff from CUPS, Xorg, ALSA, and Samba are kept separated from the user interface. Why doesn't somebody try to integrate this stuff into the desktop, and make a product out of all these Tinker Toys?

Ah well, at least in Windows I can change my default sound card without being a Dungeon Master.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 50.43
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 9.3
SMOG:10.9
Coleman Liau:16.52

European Sales Tax Rates

Posted by Rube | 13 November, 2006

For no particular reason, here's a list of national sales tax rates of European countries.

Country Sales Tax %
Austria 9.09-16.67%
Belgium 21%
Denmark 25%
Finland 17-22%
France 5.21-16.38%
Germany 7-16%
Greece 11.5-15.25%
Ireland 17.36%
Italy 4-20%
Luxembourg 15%
Netherlands 15.97%
Portugal 19% (13% in Madeira and Azores)
Spain 16%
Sweden 25%
Switzerland 7.6%
United Kingdom 17.5%

via Europe for Visitors.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 64.71
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.0
SMOG:11.1
Coleman Liau:19.6

A Shadow World-Within-a-World

Posted by Rube | 12 November, 2006

Do you ever get the feeling that, just beneath the surface of the visible world, the world which you and I would consider reality, strange forces lurk, forming a sort of world-within-a-world? I didn't either, honestly. I mean, I've seen The Matrix, and I have to admit that their explanation, that a war between man and machine created a 300-year long meta-reality in which mankind is held thrall to a sentient, evil race of machines, would go a long way toward explaining things, like Everybody Loves Raymond.

But I'm not here to take cheapshots at non-threatening TV shows. I'm here to tell you that everything you've sensed, everything you've feared about meta-reality complex is true. I know this, because I've discovered a blind spot, a bubble in the Matrix. I've discovered a gathering place in the Internet where the world's top engineers, obviously unbeknownst to our bionical slavemasters, continue a discussion which already spans 9000 words, almost 40 pages of calculations and hypotheses.

It's a discussion about bacon.

Conclusions Microwaved - The bacon came out extremely crisp throughout both the fat and meat of the bacon. It felt a bit thicker than I expected from a thin cut piece of bacon. Examining the fat collected in the paper towels leads me to believe that very little fat was rendered out in comparison to the pan fry method. The technique is simple and hands free, but a problem that I have is that the paper towel stuck to several of the pieces of bacon. This may have been because I allowed the bacon to rest and drain on the same paper towel it was cooked on. Another issue is the limited number of bacon strips you can cook in a microwave oven at one time (but the time savings probably more than makes up for this).

Pan fried - The bacon felt the thinnest and lightest of the three. The bacon fat was crispy while the meat was slightly chewy. I actually prefer my bacon this way (not totally crunchy and crispy, but with some texture to it), but others may not. All in all, a good method to cook bacon but time consuming.

Broiled - The bacon was burnt in some spots and the meat felt undercooked. The areas need the burns were bitter in taste and the texture was soft and soggy throughout (except for the blackened parts). Not much fat was rendered off either. I would not recommend this technique.

So, microwaving is king if you're looking for bacon that feels thicker than what you purchased and crunchy throughout. Pan frying is great for a thin, light bacon with a little chew in the meat.

Methodical, thorough, and brilliant. It goes on for pages and pages, with a column of crack scientists discussing the merits and demerits of various bacon-charring technologies. I tremble in horror.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 63.8
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.3
SMOG:11.1
Coleman Liau:11.54

Boing Boing Breaks Own Record

Posted by Rube | 10 November, 2006

In a startling development, the smug leftist hipsters at überblog Boing Boing have gone two (2) straight days without mentioning Diebold. The last mention of the maligned "voting" machine manufacturer was right before the "election" results came in. Which, coincidentally, showed huge Democrat "wins".

Could it be that Diebold's agents have gotten to Xeni and Cory?! It couldn't possibly be that the whole body of anti-e-voting writings was just screeching partisan hysterics, could it?

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 1.9
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 15.5
SMOG:10.7
Coleman Liau:30.42

Late Adopter

Posted by Rube | 10 November, 2006

Scott-Dvxi960CsBeing a late adopter has its advantages. For example, I just picked up a Scott i960CS, which is a commodity DVD/standalone DivX player. It cost about fifty bucks, and is so generic that it's nigh ungoogleable. I bought it to replace my fifty-dollar DVD player, which was getting a bit long in the tooth. About three years ago, I really, really wanted one of these, but they were going for a cool $400 at the local shops, so I decided to buy shoes and electricity instead. Now, I can pick one up at about 12% the cost that I would have gladly forked out back then, had I had the cash.

What a cool thing these doodads are. It will play just about anything you throw at it, format-wise. You can easily shut off the irritating region restrictions that would otherwise keep you from playing DVDs from other countries, which in my case would be the US-bought movies that comprise about half my collection. It's got a USB port, into which you can plug a thumb drive, iPod, or external hard drive, and browse them to play media.

My big idea was to copy all my music and movies to an external 160GB hard drive, hook it up to the USB port, and never have to switch discs again. Unfortunately, two things keep me from doing that. First, the Scott doesn't read long filenames from external devices (data DVDs seem to work fine), so you'll have to wade through FAT32-style mangled names, trying to figure out what “BLOWJO~1.AVI? could possibly be. And second, whenever you access the external drive, it thrashes around alarmingly, as the player apparently scans the entire thing at a go. It's scary enough that I'll stick to copying things over to the USB flash stick for the time being.

I realize this was all new and hot about three years ago, but that's what's great about being a late adopter: 50 bucks and you get that consumerist rush. Now, I can't wait until Christmas 2009 when I can pick up that sweet-ass Xbox 360 I'll be having my eye on.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 63.09
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.6
SMOG:10.6
Coleman Liau:12.35

Flashback: The Contract with America

Posted by Rube | 10 November, 2006

Twelve years ago, the Republicans took power under the leadership of Newt Gingrich. Newt was a man that even 17-year old liberal drama fags at my high school hated in the '80s, so I was predispositioned to like him, even before I was old enough to vote. Anything that annoys pretentious, faux-political teenage liberals is fine by my book.

When they first came into power, the nation was damn near on internal Red Alert. Conspiracy theories, ranging from Con-Trails to cattle mutilations(!) by black-helicopter-flying secret government cryptofascist organizations, Unabombers, X-Files, Branch Davidians, Randy Weaver, Timothy McVeigh; you guys remember all that stuff, right? Well, it looks like it's that time again, kids! (Only this time, the Democrats have got the Patriot Act in their bag of tricks. And that seemed like such a good idea when the GOP was running the show...)

Gingrich, along with rich genius bastard Dick Armey, devised a scheme to defuse the situation. They called it the Contract with America, and it amounted to a Republican business plan for the newly-acquired Congress, Inc. I'm including it here on the vain hope that I'll actually read it all the way through at some point, and be able to assess what sort of progress the Republicans made over the last 12 years, in comparison to what they were actually all fired-up to do.

As Republican Members of the House of Representatives and as citizens seeking to join that body we propose not just to change its policies, but even more important, to restore the bonds of trust between the people and their elected representatives.

That is why, in this era of official evasion and posturing, we offer instead a detailed agenda for national renewal, a written commitment with no fine print. This year's election offers the chance, after four decades of one-party control, to bring to the House a new majority that will transform the way Congress works. That historic change would be the end of government that is too big, too intrusive, and too easy with the public's money. It can be the beginning of a Congress that respects the values and shares the faith of the American family. Like Lincoln, our first Republican president, we intend to act "with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right." To restore accountability to Congress. To end its cycle of scandal and disgrace. To make us all proud again of the way free people govern themselves. On the first day of the 104th Congress, the new Republican majority will immediately pass the following major reforms, aimed at restoring the faith and trust of the American people in their government: • FIRST, require all laws that apply to the rest of the country also apply equally to the Congress; • SECOND, select a major, independent auditing firm to conduct a comprehensive audit of Congress for waste, fraud or abuse; • THIRD, cut the number of House committees, and cut committee staff by one-third; • FOURTH, limit the terms of all committee chairs; • FIFTH, ban the casting of proxy votes in committee; • SIXTH, require committee meetings to be open to the public; • SEVENTH, require a three-fifths majority vote to pass a tax increase; • EIGHTH, guarantee an honest accounting of our Federal Budget by implementing zero base-line budgeting. Thereafter, within the first 100 days of the 104th Congress, we shall bring to the House Floor the following bills, each to be given full and open debate, each to be given a clear and fair vote and each to be immediately available this day for public inspection and scrutiny. 1. THE FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: A balanced budget/tax limitation amendment and a legislative line-item veto to restore fiscal responsibility to an out- of-control Congress, requiring them to live under the same budget constraints as families and businesses. (Bill Text) (Description)
  1. THE TAKING BACK OUR STREETS ACT: An anti-crime package including stronger truth-in- sentencing, "good faith" exclusionary rule exemptions, effective death penalty provisions, and cuts in social spending from this summer's "crime" bill to fund prison construction and additional law enforcement to keep people secure in their neighborhoods and kids safe in their schools. (Bill Text) (Description)
  2. THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY ACT: Discourage illegitimacy and teen pregnancy by prohibiting welfare to minor mothers and denying increased AFDC for additional children while on welfare, cut spending for welfare programs, and enact a tough two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility. (Bill Text) (Description)
  3. THE FAMILY REINFORCEMENT ACT: Child support enforcement, tax incentives for adoption, strengthening rights of parents in their children's education, stronger child pornography laws, and an elderly dependent care tax credit to reinforce the central role of families in American society. (Bill Text) (Description)
  4. THE AMERICAN DREAM RESTORATION ACT: A S500 per child tax credit, begin repeal of the marriage tax penalty, and creation of American Dream Savings Accounts to provide middle class tax relief. (Bill Text) (Description)
  5. THE NATIONAL SECURITY RESTORATION ACT: No U.S. troops under U.N. command and restoration of the essential parts of our national security funding to strengthen our national defense and maintain our credibility around the world. (Bill Text) (Description)
  6. THE SENIOR CITIZENS FAIRNESS ACT: Raise the Social Security earnings limit which currently forces seniors out of the work force, repeal the 1993 tax hikes on Social Security benefits and provide tax incentives for private long-term care insurance to let Older Americans keep more of what they have earned over the years. (Bill Text) (Description)
  7. THE JOB CREATION AND WAGE ENHANCEMENT ACT: Small business incentives, capital gains cut and indexation, neutral cost recovery, risk assessment/cost-benefit analysis, strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act and unfunded mandate reform to create jobs and raise worker wages. (Bill Text) (Description)
  8. THE COMMON SENSE LEGAL REFORM ACT: "Loser pays" laws, reasonable limits on punitive damages and reform of product liability laws to stem the endless tide of litigation. (Bill Text) (Description)
  9. THE CITIZEN LEGISLATURE ACT: A first-ever vote on term limits to replace career politicians with citizen legislators. (Description) Further, we will instruct the House Budget Committee to report to the floor and we will work to enact additional budget savings, beyond the budget cuts specifically included in the legislation described above, to ensure that the Federal budget deficit will be less than it would have been without the enactment of these bills. Respecting the judgment of our fellow citizens as we seek their mandate for reform, we hereby pledge our names to this Contract with America.
Open committees?! Three-fifths majority for tax increases?! The democrats must have thought the Mongol Horde of Jesusland had just waded into the room.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 33.14
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 13.9
SMOG:14.1
Coleman Liau:18.45
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 49.48
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 7.6
SMOG:0.0
Coleman Liau:16.56

Elections: World Reaction

Posted by Rube | 9 November, 2006

When watching baseball, live in the stadium, things are not always what they appear. Oftentimes, a pop-fly to deep short will look just like a home run to someone sitting in the upper deck, causing half the crowd (in Atlanta, anyway) to jump out of their seats and spill their beer, only to sit down again in humiliation when the shortstop catches it.

People who know how to watch baseball never judge a ball by the crack of the bat, or the appearance of its arc: They watch the outfielders. If the outfields turn around and start high-tailing for the fences, you just might have a homerun on your hands, stand up and scream. Otherwise, if they just start scratching themselves and looking into the crowd while the ball's still sailing, just play it cool, because it's a pop-up.

That's why I refer to the various cranks, commies, and dictators of the world collectively as The Outfielders. If I'm unsure how I should feel about a certain event, I judge their reaction to it, and relativize. If they lose their shit and start foaming at the mouth about something Bush or the USA in general does, it's a pretty fair bet that it's just what the doctor ordered. On the other hand, there's this:

Chavez Chavez applauds Rumsfeld's resignation

CARACAS (VENEZUELA): Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez applauded the resignation of US Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and suggested President George W. Bush should quit as well. Chavez pointed to the strong gains by Democrats in US congressional elections and called it a "reprisal vote" against Bush's policies and the Iraq war. The leftist leader beamed as he read aloud a news report of Rumsfeld's resignation.
Puppet3 Change in America
Not only liberal Americans but peace-loving people all over the world must feel relieved by Democrats’ landslide victory Tuesday. But few would feel more pleased with the election results than North Korea’s Kim Jong-il
Bushs-Plan-For-Iraq Asia Times' Tom Englehardt
Plebiscite on an Outlaw Empire The wave - and make no mistake, it's a global one - has just crashed on America's shores, soaking our imperial masters. It's a sight for sore eyes.
"A Reckless Government of Idiots"
"The US government of Republicans and neo-conservatives, which is a reckless government of idiots, will be reined in with the Democrats taking over the House," Oraib Rintawi, President of the Al Quds Centre for Political Studies in Amman...

Picture 18

LANDSLIDE! ...a big thanks from Michael Moore

You did it! We did it! The impossible has happened: A majority of Americans have soundly and forcefully removed Bush's party from control of the House of Representatives and the Republicans have also, miraculously, been tossed out of running our United States Senate.
And finally, a comment from someone with an IQ above 80:

TUESDAY WAS GOOD NEWS FOR .... WHO?[sic]

Those who want a weaker America

(Accepting the award will be Dominique Marie François René Galouzeau de Villepin, sometimes known as Dominique de Villepin, the Prime Minister of France. Dominique was the leader of the Axis of Weasels before he became Prime Minister.)

A poll earlier this year said that something like 58% of Europeans wanted a weaker America. They got their wish on Tuesday. Who is going to be there to pull their candied asses out of the oven when they finally wake up and realize the great strides that have been made in the Islamification of Europe? Hello Eurabia.

The first blow to be struck in the weakening of America will be for the Democrats to get rid of John Bolton as the Ambassador to the United Nations. They'll replace him with someone who will not stand up to UN corruption and the forces who want to weaken us.

The leftist media.

(Accepting the award for The New York Times, The Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The Boston Globe, Time Magazine, Newsweek Magazine and too many more to mention will be Dan Rather)

Ninety percent or more of these people vote Democrat. They engaged in a six-year campaign of demonization of George Bush. It worked.

Man, you know that something that excites every two-bit dictator in the world just has to be Bad News. But how can it be wrong, when it feels sooooo right!

Pelosi

"Thank you, Ms. Speaker, may I have another!"

Technorati Tags: , , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 47.28
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 10.5
SMOG:11.4
Coleman Liau:20.3

Selective Enforcement

Posted by Rube | 8 November, 2006

Friday night, while riding on the tram. It was well after midnight, and my sweetie and I were on the way home from a friend's birthday party. While we were waiting for the train to get rolling, some drunk guy got on board and started harassing the driver for no obvious reason.

Apparently sensing danger, the driver called the police to have the man removed from the train. The cops arrived and, after some muss, fuss, and pepper-spray, wrestled said drunk guy to the ground.

Here you can see them giving him the German version of the Rodney King treatment.

Drunk-Vigilante

What I don't really get is this: See that guy with the blond hair looking at the camera? The one who's got his knee stuck in the drunk guy's kidneys? He wasn't a cop. He was just some other drunk guy. I'm not sure why the cops would let some random drunk guy join in on the police brutality here, seeing as that's sort of their job.

So, does that mean if I see someone getting arrested, I can run up and give him the elbow?

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 73.17
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 6.8
SMOG:7.9
Coleman Liau:9.68
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 28.5
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 11.5
SMOG:7.8
Coleman Liau:24.56

Bullshit Detector

Posted by Rube | 7 November, 2006

Apparently, the bullshit detector is not standard equipment for Democrats:

Republicans are so afraid to run on their merits that they continue to resort to dirty tricks.

Listen to this robocall (.WAV) being sent to Virginia voters:

Tim Daly from Clarendon got a call saying that if he votes Tuesday, he will be arrested. A recording of his voicemail can be found online at: www.webbforsenate.com/media/phone_message.wav

The transcript from his voicemail reads:

"This message is for Timothy Daly. This is the Virginia Elections Commission. We've determined you are registered in New York to vote. Therefore, you will not be allowed to cast your vote on Tuesday. If you do show up, you will be charged criminally."

Daly has been registered to vote in Virginia since 1998, and he has voted for the last several cycles with no problem. He has filed a criminal complaint with the Commonwealth's attorney in Arlington.

I've been hearing these stories from the left ever since I started voting. The only voter intimidation I've ever personally witnessed is the same constant badgering of conservatives as racist, homophobic, reactionary, Christian fundamentalists that has become the mainstream criticism of the right in the media and, indeed, in general discourse. Now, I'm supposed to believe that the Republican party is creating personalized-yet-automated phone messages for Democrats in an attempt to illegally disenfranchise Daily Kos readers? While I'm for it in principle, I doubt they'd be that brazen.

What they're actually charging here is that Republicans are calling voters and threatening them with arrest if they vote Democrat. Now, I'm pretty jaded to the shrill whining that passes for Progressive political discussion, so I usually just scroll past such news stories as so much humbug. But what does that do for our general political alertness level? Who's actually going to notice if some sort of diabolically crooked electioneering really does subvert the American political process? I don't think that Diebold is really on the side of Republicans, guys. At least not to the point that they'd rat out a Democratic administration in y'all's favor.

The Democrats are going to get trounced in this election, at least if they get what they deserve. I'm so fed up with their mock outrage, I'm almost wishing I hadn't thrown my vote away on Libertarians. Get out there; vote Republican; and let's see if we can make that vein pop out on Kos's forehead again.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 48.6
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 10.0
SMOG:11.5
Coleman Liau:14.49
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 22.68
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 11.7
SMOG:10.3
Coleman Liau:39.96
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 59.3
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 8.0
SMOG:0.0
Coleman Liau:11.3

Blogging: What's Your Kit?

Posted by Rube | 5 November, 2006

When I was up visiting the Straight White Guy last month, we discussed one thing that I'd always forgotten to talk about at blog meets: Blogging.

Eric puts out content more consistently than most bloggers, so I thought it would be interesting to know how goes about doing it. Unfortunately, he belongs to that shady Mu-Nu sect, so most of what he was saying came across as so much glassy-eyed Scientology to my untrained ears.

So, how does Rube 'post' a 'blog', you may ask? Well, let's take a look behind scenes!

[cue 'Leave it to Beaver' music and throaty-voiced announcer]

First off, Rube has to decide that he wants to post. This is actually the most difficult part of the entire process, and the weakest link in the chain of productivity.

If Rube make it past that hurdle, Rube fires up his trusty blogging program, ecto (click pictures for bigger versions):

Picture 5-2

So, Rube clicks on 'New', and up comes the dreaded blank page of inspirationlessness. Picture 8-2

This is usually the part where I sit there a moment, wait for something to happen without my intervention, then close the application in bitter, crushing defeat. But today, we've got this post here to write, so onward! I choose a category from the list on the right, and start a-typing.

But at some point, I've got to get these screenshots in here. No problem, just hit the attachments button and choose an image:

Picture 7-1

And Viola, it pops it right in there.

Picture 9-1

Once I've gotten my (admittedly lackluster) post put together, I can either save it, with the vain hope that at some point in the future I'll actually try to improve it, or publish it without regard to quality, accuracy or entertainment value. So, I hit publish. At which point, ecto does the rest of the work, contacting the server, uploading the pictures, pinging Technorati, and God knows what tedious grunt work that needs to be done.

And that's how it gets done over here at YouBitch! So, what's your kit?

Technorati Tags: , ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 16.49
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 14.1
SMOG:10.4
Coleman Liau:29.86
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 14.63
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 12.7
SMOG:9.7
Coleman Liau:28.82

BugMeNot Button

Posted by Rube | 5 November, 2006

Here's a minor update the BugMeNot Browser Button™. It's a little javascript-bookmarklet for your browser toolbar/favorites that will popup the BugMeNot Password for the page you're currently viewing.

BugMeNot

In Mozilla/Firefox, just drag it to your Favorites/Bookmarks toolbar. If you reach a registered-only news page, just click the button. In Internet Explorer (which you shouldn't use anyway), right-click the link and choose "Add to Favorites". Popup-blockers like Google Toolbar might interefere with its operation, unfortunately.

Still haven't found a way to make it pop up above the current browser window...

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 28.3
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 11.6
SMOG:10.9
Coleman Liau:24.73

TextMate Update

Posted by Rube | 4 November, 2006

I opened up TextMate so's I could do me some programmin'. It updated itself to the latest version and reloaded, as it often does, and then it popped up the following release notes:

[2006-11-02: REVISION 1324]

[REMOVED] TextMate no longer pays tribute to human sacrifices, rape, nor does it show a picture of the God of the deaths in your dock -- ticket 945BEB5D

Which, you know, good thing, too. I was getting tired of all that rape stuff while I was trying to code.

Technorati Tags: ,

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 48.4
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 10.1
SMOG:11.2
Coleman Liau:15.88

Men Explained

Posted by Rube | 4 November, 2006

Sometimes, it's so simple to be a dude:

Like I said, once you start those male hormones flowing, you reduce what little brain the poor man has to something terribly, terribly primitive. That reptilian brain can't be bargained with, can't be reasoned with, feels no pity, or remorse, or fear, and absolutely will not stop, ever, until it has succeeded in injecting a healthy dose of genetic material into your poonanny.
If men were computers, they would have what's known as a Reduced Instruction Set. You save a lot of cycles that way.

MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 55.54
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 9.4
SMOG:12.2
Coleman Liau:16.06
MetricValue
Flesch Reading Ease 100.75
Flesch-Kincaid Grade 0.3
SMOG:0.0
Coleman Liau:2.8